ensures the satisfactory progression of postgraduate research students through the progress monitoring review process. It is the duty of GSC to highlight any concerns about student progression to supervisors and students and to make remedial recommendations where necessary.  The committee will also discuss general issues, including training requirements that emerge from the monitoring process and report these to RDC for consideration.

A Postgraduate Research Coordinator is available at each academic partner, institute or centre and acts as a local point of contact and referral for student and supervisor queries:

• Executive Office: Centre for Health – Prof Ian Megson.   Centre for History – Prof David Worthington.   Language Sciences Institute – Prof Conchúr Ó Giollagáin
• Highland Theological College – Dr Jamie Grant
• UHI Inverness – to be confirmed - please contact gradresearch@uhi.ac.uk
• UHI Moray – to be confirmed - please contact gradresearch@uhi.ac.uk
• UHI North Highland – Prof Roxane Andersen
• Orkney College: Archaeology Institute – Prof Jane Downes   Institute for Northern Studies – Prof Donna Heddle
• UHI Outer Hebrides – Dr Gareth Davies
  
• Perth College – Dr Rosalind Bryce
• Sabhal Mòr Ostaig – Abigail Burnyeat
• SAMS – Prof Bhavani Narayanaswamy
• UHI Shetland – Dr Chevonne Angus; Dr Simon Clarke
• UHI West Highland – Dr Steve Taylor

Along with providing academic guidance and support, the student’s supervisory team has a responsibility for pastoral care, offering welfare advice where appropriate and directing students to specialist student support services as necessary.

The Graduate School appoints all research students with a Third Party Adviser - a research-active member of staff who is not part of the student’s supervisory team and is out with the research subject area.

This support system enables research students to have an objective discussion about their studies and receive independent academic advice concerning any matter affecting academic progress by providing:   

• pastoral support outside of the supervisory environment
• a mechanism for early identification of potential problems, thus avoiding impeding progress
• a dispassionate view if difficulties arise. 

Research students who disclose support needs can engage with their local disability support team to discuss their needs and, where appropriate, agree a Personal Learning Support Plan.

Students associated with UHI Executive Office will receive wellbeing and support services through UHI Inverness.  Areas associated with UHI Executive Office include Health (Division of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing), the Centre for History, and the Language Sciences Institute.

Making early contact with the local support services will enable appropriate support to be negotiated and put in place as early as possible; choosing not to disclose may have an impact on the support available.

The Highlands and Islands Students’ Association (HISA) represents the interests of all students at the university and its academic partners at a regional level.  HISA aims to make sure the student voice is at the heart of all decisions about learning and teaching and the student experience and to ensure the best student experience possible. HISA has postgraduate research student representation on its committees and can act as an advocate for students as well as a source of support. More details here

Research study may be undertaken at a recognised UHI location and/or in association with other research centres in the UK and overseas. Also see 'distance mode' below.

A student will be linked to an academic partner and this will normally be where they are physically based when enrolled as a full-time student. If enrolled as part-time or by distance mode, this will normally be the location they will attend when visiting their supervisors or using facilities on an ad-hoc basis. 

If the student is to be physically located at a different academic partner, the Director of Studies should liaise with all concerned to secure agreement and are strongly advised to complete a PGR Supervision and Hosting Agreement, available from the Graduate School.

On application, the Director of Studies should consider whether distance mode is viable - in line with normal procedure, Research Degrees Committee approval is required for all research degree applications, to ensure that adequate supervision and appropriate access to library, study and training provisions can be provided.

All standard regulations and procedures apply, e.g., duration of registration (full-time/part-time), programme management and expectations insofar as engagement, academic progression and examination. Additionally the following guidelines outline specific requirements relating to studying at a distance and when considering distance mode, the applicant and proposed Director of Studies should think carefully about the following:

• access to specialist library resources, laboratory facilities or fieldwork locations,
• agreement, where necessary, for use of resources owned or managed by another person or institution*,
• access to suitable study space, IT facilities and/or equipment that will enable the student to engage with the university remotely, i.e., email, videoconferencing, online materials,
• access, where required, to local support for any study-related disability or wellbeing needs.

*The university will accept no responsibility or liability with respect to necessary local provisions or the student’s engagement with these, e.g., resulting from closure or accident or other relevant incident involving the student while using these facilities. 

Students enrolled as distance mode would normally be expected to spend a minimum of 6 months (PhD) or 2 months (MRes) on-campus over the course of their registration. The length and timing of these visits are negotiable, to be agreed with the supervisory team, and are not likely to be less than one week in duration. These visits may be scheduled to coincide with key assessment points, i.e., progress review or viva, although it is not a regulatory requirement that these are undertaken face-to-face.

If a visa is required for short-term study visits to the UK, it is the student’s responsibility to understand their immigration status and visa requirements and to apply accordingly. Note: distance mode is not available for international applicants who intend to - or already - hold a student-route visa, which requires full-time on-campus attendance.

The University is committed to compliance with the Equality Act 2010 by endeavouring to ensure that any research applicant declaring a disability, health or medical condition is treated fairly and without discrimination or disadvantage. Any such declaration does not form part of the research degrees selection process, as applications are considered according to our published academic criteria. 

Early dialogue between the applicant and relevant staff is encouraged as this will enable the Academic Partner’s student disability support team to establish a clear understanding of the disclosed disability and informally assess the reasonable adjustments needed. 

In the event that the University is unable to provide the required support, or if there are overriding concerns about health and safety or professional fitness to practice requirements, the University will continue to work closely with the applicant, to explore all of the available options before confirming whether we can offer a place on the chosen programme.

Applicants who are registered as a research degree student at another comparable institution may apply to transfer their research degree registration to UHI. Applicants seeking to transfer should follow the standard Graduate School application process and submit the required application form and associated documentation.

This option is only available for work which has not previously contributed to an academic award. To be eligible, applicants must be prepared to register at UHI for at least 12 months (full-time) or 24 months (part-time) prior to the date of the final submission of the thesis. Where applicable, the standard PhD probationary review process should take place within the first 3 months (full-time) or 6 months (part-time) of the start date.

All applicants must include two references; these should normally be academic references, although exceptions will be made in some circumstances, e.g. applicants who have been out of education for more than three years may submit one academic and one professional reference. At least one reference must be from someone who is independent of the proposed supervisory team.

To undertake research successfully, students need to speak and write English fluently.  Non-native English speaking applicants must provide evidence of their English language ability through certified proof of competence.

The minimum English language requirements to study research at the University is IELTS Academic Test, or equivalent, with overall score of 6.5 with no element below 6.0. The test should be taken no more than two years prior to the planned enrolment date.  

Applicants who do not satisfy this criteria may be offered entry on the condition that they either achieve the minimum entry requirement by themselves, or successfully complete an approved Language Centre 6 week or 12 week Summer School Programme before the commencement of their degree.

A Confirmation of Acceptance of Studies (CAS) has to be issued by the University in order to apply for a Student Route visa - a CAS cannot be issued until an unconditional offer is made by the Graduate School.

Certain science and technology subjects require Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) clearance before an application can be made for a Student Route visa. Applicants who need to apply for ATAS clearance will receive a conditional offer which will include a statement to support their ATAS application.

Holders of a Student Route visa must be aware of, and adhere to, the immigration rules. Failure to comply with rules risks an individuals’ student status and may result in an adverse UK immigration record and being asked to leave the UK. Also at risk is the University’s sponsor licence and the status of all the international students studying at UHI.

UHI and academic partners are registered under the Data Protection Act 2018 and will hold and process personal data for all purposes connected with our statutory and business requirements.

The University is committed to protecting personal information and being clear about what information we collect from you and how we use it.

Students are responsible for ensuring their personal data held on the university’s student records system is accurate and current. Under the Data Protection Act 2018, students have the right of access to the data held about them by the University, HESA or other data controllers.

Formal offer letters may only be issued by the UHI Graduate School, although a prospective Director of Studies may communicate the result of an interview informally. 

An unconditional offer may only be made where the applicant has all the necessary qualifications and experience as outlined in our entry requirements.

Where the applicant currently lacks a necessary qualification or requirement, e.g., the completion of a taught programme or an English language qualification, a conditional offer may be made, with these conditions having to be met before an unconditional offer can be issued.

Offer letters will normally be sent out no more than ten working days after Research Degrees Committee approval. In planning for new starts, the Director of Studies must take into account the time it may take for the offer to be accepted by the student and for further processing to be done, as follows:

• Home(UK) applicant – unconditional offer letters will normally be sent out at least two weeks before the proposed start date. The RD1 application form should be submitted to the Graduate School Office at least eight weeks before the proposed start date.
• International (including applicants already in the UK) - any conditions required to be met before an unconditional offer is made will impact on the time it takes for applications to be processed – therefore assessment is made on a case-by-case basis, but generally a much longer lead time is required.

The Graduate School arranges two induction events during the academic year, usually in October and March. These events are for all newly-enrolled postgraduate research students and are designed to provide an understanding of what it means to be a research student at UHI, point out sources of key information and support and provide an overview of essential research student processes. 

A local PGR induction should be arranged at the academic partner, to ensure that students are aware of local procedures and policies. The PGR Co-ordinator, or other nominated person, may be responsible for organising this - alternatively the Director of Studies may provide induction information on a one-to-one basis.

Induction is part of a broader range of training and networking opportunities, including the annual Postgraduate Research Conference and a suite of professional development and generic skills training courses.

Enrolled students can be issued a student ID card, either locally at their academic partner or through the Graduate School.

A student e-mail address will also be set up and will be used for all UHI communications, including emails from the Graduate School. It is the student’s responsibility to check their e-mail on a regular basis - the failure to check e-mail, or non-receipt of e-mail due to a mailbox being over quota, or the non-delivery of a message to a non-UHI account, cannot be used as grounds for an academic appeal.

Those wishing to use a personal email address must set up automatic forwarding to ensure mail from their student account is forwarded.

Changes to Registration, aka Candidature Management requests (section 4) and Progress Monitoring reviews (section 5) should be submitted through PGR Manager. The system will also be developed to manage thesis submission and examination processes.

Brightspace provides details on a wide range of topics, including internal and external training resources and funding information. It is strongly recommended that this area is routinely checked, or a notification set when an announcement is added.

Subject to satisfactory progress reviews, completed according to their start date, continuing students are required to re-enrol in August each year in order to acquire a new academic year student record.

An email reminder is sent by the University’s student records office and students must re-enrol promptly to avoid disruption to their student status or access to IT systems, including PGR Manager.

Funded students should be aware that the continuation of stipend payments is dependent on timely re-enrolment.

All students should be aware that continued failure to re-register each August and/or non-engagement may result in a termination of registration.

The Graduate School initiates and maintains postgraduate research student records through the University’s student record system, SITS.

Some aspects of the SITS record are linked to background processes that determine local IT access. Therefore, any student who moves to a different University location or academic partner should notify the Graduate School so relevant records can be updated.

The nature of individual research work can vary widely, so specifying exact hours of work is difficult. However, research students should expect to study throughout the calendar year, with the amount of time spent by a full-time research student being similar to the amount of time expected of a full-time academic, i.e., on average at least 35 hours a week, with part-time students working an average of 17 hours a week.

The University recognises the importance of taking holiday for the health and wellbeing of all students.  Research students, including those who hold a Tier 4/Student Route visa, are permitted annual leave during the published closure periods of their academic partner, centre or institute, i.e. Christmas, Easter, and Bank Holidays, as appropriate.

In addition, full-time students are permitted up to 25-days holiday in each calendar year, plus public and academic partner closure days. Students should not normally take more than 15 consecutive days leave at a time and leave should be agreed, in advance, through discussion with their Director of Studies.

Part-time students have no specific holiday entitlement as they are already fitting study time around other commitments. However, holidays should form part of the schedule negotiated with the Director of Studies, who should also be kept informed of any lengthy breaks.

All leave should be taken in line with university and academic partner expectations – e.g., not taking leave during key Graduate School and local training sessions, research events, seminars etc. For those students in receipt of Research Council or other  external funding,  due  attention  should  be  paid  to  the  rules  governing  leave arrangements for those bodies.

Tier 4/Student Route holders are subject to monthly attendance checks throughout the duration of their studies, usually undertaken by their Director of Studies. If any request is made to study away from a UHI location before approval can be given the University must be satisfied that the request complies with the law regarding attendance requirements.

In situations where the student’s overall attendance is poor or monitoring reports are submitted late, this may trigger warning letters, including final warning and termination letters, advising that that student’s UKVI sponsorship may be withdrawn at the discretion of the University’s Authorising Officer.

IMPORTANT: Monthly monitoring must continue until completion, while a student holding a visa remains in the UK. 'Completion' in this context means a formal award has been made, after a viva and any necessary corrections have been confirmed and the award formally notified to the student by the Graduate School.  Submitting a thesis for examination, or submitting a corrected thesis after viva does not mean completion has been achieved.

Students should ensure their Director of Studies, or another member of the supervisory team, are informed of any situation that results in unexpected absence.

IPR are automatically assigned to the University, but an application can be made to opt out of this default position.Students should seek guidance from their Director of Studies if clarity is needed on any aspect of such management or ownership.

If a current UHI research Master’s student wishes to transfer to PhD, their standard period of registration on the new programme may be reduced on the basis of previous study, provided that it has not already contributed to an academic award.

• For full-time students, the total period of study shall not be reduced to less than 24 months
• For part-time students, the total period of study shall not be reduced to less than 36 months

The Director of Studies should be consulted in the first instance, as they will need to assess what academic equivalence, stage or standard has been reached, in order to determine the anticipated duration of registration on the new degree.

If the application is approved, the standard PhD probationary review process will take place within the first 3 months (FT) or 6 months (PT) of the new programm.

Certain circumstances may require a change to the supervisory team originally agreed, e.g., if a member of the team has left the university, or the focus of the project had changed. The Academic Partner, in discussion and agreement with a suitable representative from the supervisory team, must arrange the change of supervision in sufficient time to affect a smooth handover.

There could also be circumstances in which a student wishes to make a change to the supervisory team. This may or may not be possible, depending on a number of factors including the rationale for change and the availability of suitable alternative supervisors. Any student in this position may approach – as appropriate - their Director of Studies, their Third-Party Adviser or the Graduate School to discuss the situation.

Students may apply to suspend their studies normally for up to 12 months in a single application. The maximum amount of time that may be suspended is 24 months.

Applications must be accompanied by relevant evidence as required, e.g., medical certificate, and must be made as soon as possible and before commencing a period of suspension. Retrospective suspensions are not normally permitted. Also see below, ‘Suspensions relating to illness’.

Periods of approved suspension do not count towards the student’s period of study and the expected end date will be amended accordingly.

During a suspension, students will not have access to any University resources, including email, Brightspace, library and other systems – access will be removed 30 days after the suspension start date.

Upon the student’s return from suspension, a supervisory team meeting should be held as soon as possible to review the work plan and timetable.

If a student is in receipt of a studentship, stipend payments are not normally paid during periods of suspension, however the funders’ terms and conditions will apply in this regard. Tuition fees are not normally payable during the period of suspension and full-time students may be liable for council tax.

There is a distinction between suspending studies and extending studies. A suspension can only be taken when a student is not engaged in work towards their degree.  If a student continues to be engaged in work towards their degree, then a suspension will not be appropriate.

The following circumstances are regarded as grounds for applying for a suspension or extension of studies:

• Serious physical or mental illness of the student
• Death/serious illness of a partner, close family member or close friend
• Unforeseeable or unpreventable events such as distress or injury caused by a serious accident; the effects of being a victim of a criminal act or the distress or serious disruption caused by fire, flood or another natural catastrophe.
• Serious personal problems such as relationship problems, family crises
• Unexpected changes to the student’s source of funding (NB: students must ensure that they have the necessary funds before embarking on their degree)
• Breakdown of essential equipment where a student is unable to continue research and the use of alternative equipment is not possible.
• Delays in obtaining ethical approval where approval has been sought in good time.
• Jury service; military service
• Maternity, paternity or adoption leave
• Delays in progress due to unforeseen problems with the degree programme and/or working environment e.g., moving of offices/buildings, supervisor(s) changes and unavailability etc., which are outside of the student’s control. Note: any such issues must be reported to the Graduate School Office at the time it occurs
• Study leave, necessary for the degree programme, other than official leave of absence for study at an approved institution or fieldwork
• Internship/work placement necessary for the degree programme.

The following circumstances will not normally be regarded as grounds for applying for an extension or a suspension of studies:

• Circumstances encountered during supervised study, which should have been dealt with at the time
• The student or supervisor was unaware of policy and application procedures for suspensions and/or extensions for postgraduate degrees. It is ultimately the student’s responsibility to ensure that they are aware of all policies and procedures relevant to their registration and degree
• Further primary research and/or laboratory work
• Long-term holidays/vacations
• Inadequate planning and time management
• Difficulties with English language, including delays as a result of proof reading
• Computer or other equipment failure or theft where use of an alternative is possible or any loss of work was avoidable, except where the work is lost through the failure of UHI systems as confirmed by the relevant UHI department
• Change in employment conditions: requests from part-time students who are working while studying may exceptionally be considered where a change in employment conditions was unforeseen. This will not normally be an acceptable reason for students in the submission pending or resubmission periods.

The University is required to withdraw immigration sponsorship for Tier 4/Student Route visa holders during the suspension; therefore, students may be required to leave the UK and re-apply for a visa before returning.

While supervision is often seen as mainly intellectual guidance, a Director of Studies and other members of the supervisory team have a responsibility to be supportive of students, and where they are informed of any ongoing illness or other circumstances that affect a students’ performance, they are better able to provide support.

A suspension of studies request cannot normally be made for a period of sickness less than 4 consecutive weeks and there is an expectation to make up any time lost during the remaining period of registration.  

It is advisable to record such periods of absence on PGR Manager, to support any future application for an extension or a change in study mode, e.g., from full-time to part-time.

Stipend payments are not normally paid during periods of suspension; however, the funders' terms and conditions will apply in this regard.

The University has agreed the principle that some funded PhD students may continue to receive their stipend payments as ‘sick pay’ during approved suspensions which are covered by medical certificates for up to 13 consecutive weeks within any 12-month period. Studentship stipend payments will normally be extended by the eligible commensurate period at the end of the student’s standard registration period.

PhD students who are registered with the University on a full-time or part-time basis and who are in receipt of a studentship that makes provision for annual stipend funding from the following sources are eligible to receive stipend payments, as noted in the previous section:

1. Externally funded studentships, where the funder has made sick pay provision
2. Students awarded a studentship which is funded in full by the University of the Highlands and Islands
3. Students who are funded from external sources administered by the University may be eligible for some, or all, sick pay subject to the funders’ terms and conditions.

In the case of short-term - normally considered to be up to approximately 4 weeks in duration- self-limiting illnesses, e.g., colds, stomach upsets, for which a suspension of studies has not been sought or taken stipend payments will continue to be paid throughout the period of illness.

Students who have less than 13 weeks funding remaining at the point sick leave and associated suspension commences will receive the stipend payment during sick leave commensurate with funded time remaining.

The following groups of students are not eligible for receipt of stipend payments under the above noted principle:

• Self-funded students
• Students who have submitted their thesis for examination or are within a resubmission period post- viva
• Students who receive an externally funded stipend directly from an external organisation – these students must follow the regulations of their funder. If the funder does not provide additional funds, the university is not liable to provide any payments. In such cases, students should seek advice from the Graduate School who may be able to direct them to hardship funds, where available
• Students in receipt of awards covering tuition fees only, and
• Students who have been in receipt of funding but who are – or will be – outside of their funded period at the point at which their period of sick leave would commence.

In order to be eligible for sick pay, a suspension of studies application must be submitted through PGR Manager as soon as possible and must be accompanied by appropriate supporting evidence.

Retrospective claims for sick pay will not normally be considered.  However, this does not apply to the first 2 weeks of any longer-term period of illness on the grounds of ill health, in recognition of the uncertainty that can often accompany the early period of illness, which may also involve a period of necessary emergency activity, during which time it would not be appropriate or reasonable to expect a suspension application to be made.

When calculating an absence period (suspension), weekends and public holidays are counted as days of absence.

The normal suspension application procedure should be followed through PGR Manager, although maternity leave is calculated separately from a standard period of suspension of studies and the thesis submission deadline will be adjusted in line with the amount of any maternity leave taken.  

During this time, the student will be entitled to continued access to library and computing facilities, but not to facilities for research. Supervision guidance will also continue to be provided, albeit on a more limited basis. 

An extension application must be accompanied by evidence of progress and include a thesis plan giving target dates for the completion of each chapter to support the feasibility of submitting the thesis within the extension period. This evidence should also be provided in the annual progress review, which should be submitted at the beginning of the extension period year.

Funded students should not assume any extension agreed will automatically mean an extension in funding is available.

 

During this time, the student will be entitled to continued access to library and computing facilities, but access to facilities for research may be limited and will be made available at the discretion of the Academic Partner. Supervision guidance will also continue to be provided, albeit likely to be on a more limited basis. 

An annual progress review must be submitted at the beginning of each continuation year, providing evidence of progress and including a thesis plan, giving target dates for the completion of each chapter to support the feasibility of submitting the thesis by the end of the period.

It is the expectation of Research Councils that full-time PhD students funded by them should submit their thesis for examination within four years of starting their programme of research. Any cost relating to an extension fee will normally be met by the student and continued stipend payments cannot be assumed.

Students must comply with the requirement of their funding body with regards to the length of period of study and deadline for submission of thesis.

Tier 4 or Student Route visa holders should refer to - and abide by - the terms of their visa when considering extending their registration. The Confirmation of Acceptance of Studies (CAS) end date should be the target submission date, as UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI) considers this to be the programme end date - it is important to not use the visa end date as the submission date. The Graduate School can provide further clarification, if required.  

The termination of a student’s registration may be an outcome of the remediation process, undertaken as a result of unsatisfactory progress through the progress review process. Continued failure to re-register each August and/or non-engagement may also result in a termination of registration.

The Director of Studies is responsible for notifying the Graduate School in cases of continued non-engagement. Where applicable, reasonable attempts to contact the student by email (personal and student account) and letter will be made by the Graduate School.

Following notification of non-engagement, a one-month deadline will be given by which time the student should have contacted the Graduate School – if no contact has been made by this deadline, Research Degree Committee reserves the right to terminate without further notice, after consultation with the Director of Studies.

Tier 4/Student Route visa holders must be aware that withdrawal may affect their immigration status and they may be required to leave the country once they withdraw from their studies. If a student’s registration ends, the University can no longer sponsor a student to remain in the UK and is legally bound to report the withdrawal to the Home Office. 

• Provide the student with an opportunity to present aspects of their academic work and achievements for the period of the review.
• Highlight any problems experienced by either student or supervisor during the review period.
• Discuss the need for a ‘Plan B’ to be in place, if not already, in case aspect(s) don’t go according to plan.
• Provide the panel with an opportunity to reflect on the student’s progress and give constructive verbal and written feedback.
• Review and agree any training needs.
• Consider if existing ethical approval remains appropriate, or if a new ethics application needs to be submitted.
• Gauge the ability of the student to complete within the timescale – for students who, at the end of the year, are due to submit a thesis for examination, a decision should be made about the feasibility of a submission at this time. This should prompt a discussion about applying for an extension, how much extra time is required and the amount of supervision required during this additional time.

The panel should consist of the following:

• Student
• Director of Studies
• Other supervisor(s)
• Two other members of UHI academic staff who are research active in the student’s area but not involved in a supervisory capacity (if two suitable academic staff cannot be identified, one will suffice as a minimum).
• It may also be necessary or beneficial to invite external stakeholders or partners as appropriate. Please note, external panel members cannot act as the thesis panel chair.

The student would normally be required to give a presentation to the panel (approximately 10-15 minutes), giving background to their topic, methods and future plans.

There should be the opportunity for students to speak with the panel without the supervisor(s) being present – and vice versa.

The thesis panel chair, on behalf of the whole panel, should submit feedback including any recommendations. The panel’s input does not constitute a formal assessment but will contribute to the review process. The process is intended to be supportive of both student and supervisory team by providing constructive feedback.

If remediation is supported by Graduate School Committee, the Graduate School will arrange – and clerk - a formal meeting, which should normally be attended by:

• Chair of Graduate School Committee, or Research Degrees Committee, or another suitable nominee
• Student
• Director of Studies
• Other supervisors
• The student may also invite their Third-Party Advisor or other person acting in a supportive capacity.

This aim of the meeting is to:

• Advise the student that they have not made satisfactory progress after (a) the stage 1 reappraisal period or (b) working through issues raised as part of the normal supervisory process
• Detail the reasons for concern
• Reassure the student that the meeting has been arranged to formally consider the reasons for concern and identify ways to address the concerns and support their future progress
• Give the student the opportunity to raise any mitigating circumstances
• Set clear, realistic and measurable targets for improving performance which allow the student to demonstrate satisfactory progress within an agreed timeframe
• Identify any training needs and support mechanisms and how these might be secured
• Explain the mechanism to assess whether the targets have been completed satisfactorily, within the timescale allowed
• Explain that continued unsatisfactory progress may lead to a recommendation for termination of research degree registration.

At the meeting, the student will have the opportunity to raise any further mitigating circumstances and to speak with the Chair without the supervisors being present. The supervisors will also have the opportunity to speak with the Chair without the student being present.

One of the following may be recommended:

• 3-month Remediation period (may be recommended on one occasion only)

- the meeting notes will record what is required to be done in the 3-month period, including any work that should be submitted to the Director of Studies and the deadline by which to do this

- these notes will constitute a formal warning, and funded students should be aware that external funders’ terms and conditions may require the university to notify them if a formal warning is given.

• Continue onto MPhil enrolment (available only for students registered for PhD)

- the student's record will be changed to MPhil and the expected submission (end) date adjusted accordingly

-  the Director of Studies should, as a matter of urgency, meet with the student to draft a new thesis timetable and plan. Ongoing progress will be monitored through the normal supervisory meeting process, and progress review process if appropriate.

• Termimation of the student’s registration with immediate effect

- the Graduate School will notify the student in writing and the supervisory team. The student's academic partner Head and PGR Co-ordinator will also be informed

- the Academic Partner leaving policy should be followed to ensure return of equipment, data, access and ID cards as appropriate. The student will no longer have access to UHI systems such as e-mail and library services.

Where the student has undertaken a 3-month remediation period the Director of Studies, in consultation with the supervisory team, will recommend either that remediation has been satisfactory or that the student must continue onto MPhil enrolment or that registration should be terminated.

Where the outcome of the 3-month remediation period is satisfactory remediation, the student will continue with the progress review schedule for their degree and the supervisory meetings process will continue to monitor progress. Where outcome is continue onto MPhil enrolment or termination of registration, Research Degrees Committee are required to ratify the decision.

It should be noted that – at any stage of the reappraisal or remediation process, whilst academic progress may have been judged as satisfactory, this does not guarantee confirmation of PhD registration and/or that a degree will be awarded. To qualify for the award of a research degree, a student must meet the required learning outcomes for the degree and satisfy the examiners.

It is expected that the student will attend the remediation meeting on the date and time arranged. Normally this will be face-to-face, however in some circumstances – e.g., when the student is not in the UK – the meeting may be held by videoconferencing. Staff not based locally who are invited to meetings may also attend by videoconferencing.

It is not mandatory for the student to attend a meeting. However, the student should be aware that if they do not attend (without good reason), they will forgo the opportunity to present their case directly to the attendees. Failure to attend the meeting will not prevent the instigation or conclusion of the remediation process.

Where the student is unable to attend for genuine reason, the Graduate School and the Director of Studies must be notified immediately and provide an explanation for their unavailability, with documentary evidence where appropriate. If it is agreed to postpone the meeting a new date will be given, although Graduate School Committee may choose to hold the meeting in the absence of the student unless the reasons for the absence – in the view of the Committee – are sufficiently compelling to warrant a further postponement. The absence or non-availability of a supporter (see ‘Advice and Support’ below) will not be accepted as good reason for any postponement.

The student may attend a meeting accompanied by a supporter, e.g., a friend or students’ association representative. Under this process the definition of friend excludes members of the legal profession engaged to act in their professional capacity.  The supporter is not permitted to represent the student or to speak on their behalf and they cannot appear if the student is not present.

In cases where it is considered appropriate for a student to be co-supervised by academic staff who are married to each other or who are partners or who are closely related, it is important that all such relationships be declared as part of the application process.  A research student should not have a supervisor and a Third Party Adviser who are related by marriage, civil partnership, blood/law or who are partners.

The academic partner must make arrangements for maintaining the supervision of research students whenever a supervisor is absent, and a change of supervisor application should be submitted.

• Familiarity with regulations governing research degrees
• Attendance at regular supervisor training courses
• Compliance with the requirements of the postgraduate structured management framework in relation to the training, supervision and monitoring of the research student
• Submission of timely progress reviews for consideration by Research Degrees Committee and to meet with the student where progress is deemed as ‘not satisfactory’ or ‘satisfactory with refinements’
• Assurance that their workload is such as to allow adequate time to be given to supervised students
• Advising Research Degrees Committee of any lack of resources, which may prevent the student from completing their study within the period of study
• Advising on extensions or suspension of study as appropriate.
• Keep up to date with UHI and academic partner training regarding GDPR and confidentiality of information and adhere to UHI and academic partner regulations in this regard.

• Give guidance about planning the research programme, about literature and sources, and about requisite skills
• Ensuring that the research student has the opportunity to become acquainted with all relevant safety regulations and procedures, and receives appropriate training and supervision when following any course of action or using any technique that might be deemed hazardous or dangerous
• Should direct students to appropriate sources of welfare advice where required, and if necessary, advise that the student contact the Academic Partner’s Student Support Services
• Ensure that reasonable adjustments are made to the study environment if required
• Ensure that a student from overseas has the necessary linguistic and other skills to ensure effective use of their time and experience, and take steps to assist those in need of support to obtain appropriate help
• If not already done so, undertake the Ethics Reflection and Practice training module and thereafter provide information and guidance to students during their application for ethical approval
• Ensure that training needs are discussed within a month of admission (it may or may not be appropriate at this point for a training needs analysis to be completed).

• Maintain regular contact through formal on-campus supervisory meetings, or by electronic means if the student is part-time, distance learning or not at a university location, e.g., on fieldwork
• Maintain reasonable accessibility so that advice may be offered during informal meetings, and arrange alternative support through another member of the supervisory team when away for protracted periods
• Explain best research practice and ethical considerations as early as possible in the student’s studies
• Review written work and other outputs on a regular basis as appropriate
• Return such work with constructive criticism within a time period to be agreed with the student that does not impede the student’s progress
• Work collaboratively with other supervisors when involved in a supervisory team
• Agree notes of formal meetings with the student
• Give detailed advice about completion dates and guidance on pacing of work - it is expected that students will normally submit their thesis within the standard period of registration
• Advise the student on other members of staff or experts in the field whom they might consult
• Arrange as appropriate for the student to present work at graduate seminars, staff seminars and conferences
• Advise on ethical issues relating to the conduct of the research, including how to obtain the approval of relevant ethics committees and consideration of the need for application to the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (PVG) scheme, if appropriate
• Advise on honest and fair dealing with the work of others quoted or paraphrased in the written work of the student
• Consult with the student on the appropriate recognition of the student’s contribution to research publications, taking into account current policy on Intellectual Property Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, with particular reference to anonymity
• Ensure that the student has adequate opportunities to become aware of the standards required and the standards being attained
• Advise on whether and when a student should request a transfer to a higher degree e.g., MRes to PhD
• Advise whenever progress or standards of work are below what are generally expected and the implications of unsatisfactory progress.

• Determine what training in research methods, skills and further education in the subject are required by the student
• Undertake, with the student, a training needs analysis by the time of the probationary review and ideally annually thereafter throughout their prescribed period of study, to determine the student’s research, transferable and generic skills requirements
• Ensure that the student has access to the required skills training and development opportunities and agree with the student a programme of skills training.

• Advise on career and professional development
• Discuss CV-writing and job applications, and direct the student to skills training courses and careers service
• Try to ensure by advice and encouragement that the thesis is submitted within the specified time and within the specified word limit
• Receive and comment on the final draft of the thesis
• Offer advice and training as required for the viva
• Submit nominations for internal and external examiners to the Graduate School
• Aid in preparation for the viva, providing a mock viva if requested.

• Be familiar with the requirements of the Postgraduate Structured Management Framework and discuss these with their supervisory team as appropriate
• Ensure the submission of the required progress review process within stipulated timeframes
• If deemed as ‘not satisfactory’ with regard to progress, enter a reappraisal period
• Raise issues and concerns in a timely manner with the supervisory team either directly or through the supervisory meeting process or the progress review process. If this is not appropriate, issues and concerns can be raised through the Third Party Adviser and thereafter if necessary, the Graduate School
• Where research interests diverge substantially from what was originally intended, it might be appropriate to be allocated to a new supervisor. This should be discussed with the current Director of Studies, then the Graduate School if necessary.

• Agree a timetable for their research programme with their Director of Studies
• Prior to embarking on empirical work or fieldwork (data collection) seek approval from the Director of Studies and ensure compliance with relevant policies and procedures
• Maintain progress in accordance with the agreed timetable
• Agree a schedule of meetings with their supervisory team, write up notes of these meetings and agree them with their supervisors
• Keep a separate written record of their work in a research notebook/online file that can be reviewed, if required
• Discuss work and progress with their supervisory team
• Submit written work as and when required by their supervisory team
• Take the initiative with their supervisory team in defining and raising concerns or difficulties
• Agree with their supervisory team a plan and timetable for the writing of the thesis
• Refer to Brightspace and circulated training information and announcements regularly
• International students must maintain awareness of - and adhere to - the immigration rules, as failure to comply with rules will risk the visa status and may result in an adverse UK immigration record and the student being asked to leave the UK.

• Discuss the proposed research area with the Director of Studies and obtain timely ethical approval of the research by following UHI policy and processes
• Undertake the university’s Ethics Reflection and Practice training module
• Consider and address appropriately, all ethical protocols and standards that apply in UK research, allied to their own discipline area of study, including consideration of the need for application to the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (PVG) scheme, if appropriate
• Consult with their supervisor on the appropriate recognition of their contribution to research publications, taking into account current policy on Intellectual Property Rights and the Data Protection Act 2018, with particular reference to anonymity

• Define their training and educational needs and discuss them with their supervisory team, as part of personal development planning
• Undertake, with their supervisory team, a training needs analysis by the time of the probationary review and ideally annually thereafter throughout their prescribed period of study, to determine research, transferable and generic skills requirements
• Arrange as appropriate, in liaison with other students, opportunities to host research training events or seminars within their academic partner
• Attend the Graduate School annual student conference at least once throughout studies
• Attend courses as identified in the training needs analysis with the agreement of their Director of Studies and with reference to relevant UHI regulations.

• Be aware that their thesis is their own work and responsibility
• Accept that, while their supervisory team will give advice, constructive feedback and other guidance, they must take ultimate responsibility for the final version of their thesis
• Decide whether or not to accept any advice or suggestions given by the supervisory team
• Decide when to give notice of intention to submit, taking due account of the Director of Studies’ opinion
• Present the final draft of their thesis to their supervisory team
• Ensure timely submission of the thesis for examination
• Seek advice on preparation for the viva. 

Tier 4/Student Route holders studying at degree level or above are permitted to work 20 hours per week in any given week during their programme of study, and full-time during their agreed vacation periods. Tier 4/Student Route holders can only work on a temporary basis and cannot be employed on a permanent contract, nor can they be self-employed, set-up a business or engage in business activity.

While students studying part-time are not restricted in the hours they can work, the extent to which they manage their work and research timetable should be considered and reviewed regularly as part of the supervisor meeting activity.

Doctoral students can:

• Routinely give tutorials and seminars
• Assist in lab/practical demonstration classes
• Give occasional guest lectures
• Provide input or guidance to undergraduate group projects in their own area
• As part of their educational development, e.g., as early-career researchers they may be mentored and undertake shadow-marking exercises.

Doctoral students should not:

• Operate as Personal Academic Tutor, Programme Leader or Module Leader (unless they are a part-time student and are engaged in an existing and relevant academic role before they commenced their PhD studies)
• Be responsible for regularly setting tutorial topics
• Develop essay questions
• Be routinely expected to put in more time preparing for a tutorial than they are paid for
• Co-ordinate, convene or teach modules independently at any level
• Mark coursework and exams above SCQF Level 9. Marking for summative assessment will always be subject to normal second marking arrangements.

• PhD - 100,000 words.
• MPhil - 70,000 words (exit award from PhD).
• MSc by Research, MLitt, MRes - 40,000 words. MRes with taught component of at least 20 credits – normally 30,000 words.

Theses submitted in Gaelic automatically have a 20% increase on standard word limits (as outlined below) due to the nature of the Gaelic language.

• PhD - 120,000 words.
• MPhil - 84,000 words (exit award from PhD).
• MSc by Research, MLitt, MRes - 48,000 words; MRes with taught component of at least 20 credits – normally 36,000 words.

Where the thesis is accompanied by creative work the critical writing element of the thesis should normally be no more than:

• PhD - English: 40,000 words. Gaelic: 48,000 words.
• MPhil (exit award from PhD) – English: 20,000 words. Gaelic: 24,000 words.
• MSc by Research, MLitt, MRes with or without taught component – English: 12,000 words. Gaelic: 14,500 words.

The following rules apply to the required format of thesis submissions for all research degrees -

The thesis must be presented in the following format:

• be in A4 format (unless approved by RDC in advance)
• be in a permanent, legible typescript or print. The recommended font is Times New Roman, or Arial and the recommended text font-size is 12-point.
• be printed double-sided (single side is an option, if preferred) on good quality, reasonably sourced white paper and within the range 70 g/m2 to 100 g/m2
• have a margin of at least 40mm at the left-hand binding edge of the page. All other margins must be at least 15 mm.
• use double or one-and-a-half line spacing for the main text. For indented quotations and footnotes, you may use single spacing.
• have pages numbered consecutively throughout the main text, including any whole-page diagrams or illustrations.
• include a title page specifying:
  • full title of the thesis
  • full name of the author (the student) - please CAPITALISE the Surname/Family name
  • statement that the thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the university for the appropriate award - e.g. This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the Highlands and Islands for the degree of xxx
  • (if any) the name of any formally approved collaborating establishments or funding bodies - e.g. This research programme was carried out in collaboration with xxx / funded by xxx / funded as part of the xxx programme.
  • For UHI award: the month and year of submission
  • For Aberdeen award: the year of submission
• incorporate an abstract of around 300 words stating the nature and scope of the work undertaken and contribution made to knowledge of the subject.
• a contents page.
• a statement of objectives (this can be part of the introduction, if preferred)
• a reference list or bibliography
• not contain any material that has been previously submitted for an award at an institute of Higher Education either in the UK or overseas – this must be confirmed through the student’s completion of: Submission of Thesis for Examination Form (UHI awards) or Thesis deposit declaration and checklist Form (University of Aberdeen awards)
• acknowledge if there is any published material from the thesis in advance of examination or where you are submitting publications or other materials as part of a thesis submission. In such cases, copies of the published material should either be bound in with the thesis or may be placed in a pocket at the end.
• it is customary to include acknowledgments to individuals and organisations that have assisted the student’s research, including the Director of Studies and/or Supervisory Team.

The thesis should be organised in the following format – should it be agreed that an COVID-19 impact statement be included, it should appear after the Abstract and before the main text of the thesis:

• Title page
• Abstract (approximately 300 words, on a separate page)
• List of contents
• List of tables, illustrations, etc
• List of accompanying material (if any)
• Preface (if appropriate)
• Acknowledgements
• Author’s signed declaration (suggested wording: I declare that all the material contained in this thesis is my own work.)
• Definitions
• Text of the thesis, divided into chapters, sections, etc.
• Appendices
• Glossary
• List of references
• Bibliography

• the binding must be of a fixed, permanent type so that pages cannot be removed or replaced.
• the front and rear boards must be strong enough to support the weight of the work when standing upright.
• the outside boards and spine should be sober in colour – black, dark green, maroon or navy.
• the outside front board must have the following information, in gold lettering, in at least 24-point type: the title of the thesis; the name (Surname/Family name and initials) of the author; the award (PhD, MPhil, MSc by Research, MLitt, MRes).
• the year of the final submission.
• The spine of the work must show, reading downwards: the student’s name; the award (PhD, MPhil, MSc by Research, MLitt, MRes) the year of submission or resubmission.

Where a thesis pending period and/or the maximum period of extension has been taken and a thesis for examination has not been submitted, the student will normally be automatically de-registered.

If an embargo has not been agreed during the application/registration process, the application should be submitted as early as possible and ideally before the thesis is submitted for examination. At the very latest, it should be submitted before the final version of the thesis is deposited, following examination. Late submission of an embargo request may result in the thesis being made publicly available.

Documentary evidence may be supplied to support the request, which might include:

• a letter from the research sponsor/collaborating organisation or body, confirming that the thesis contains research of commercial sensitivity
• a copy of a confidentiality agreement showing that research participants had taken part under the condition that access to the thesis would be restricted
• a letter from a prospective publisher showing that they would consider publishing works deriving from the thesis only if access to the thesis is restricted.

Requests to extend the original embargo period should be made to gradresearch@uhi.ac.uk. The request must be made at least 8 weeks before the end of the embargo period and must be supported by an explanation as to why the extension is required.

The internal panel chair is primarily responsible for ensuring 'fair play' and should:
 

• Chair the proceedings to ensure due process is followed in accordance with the university’s Regulations and Code of Practice, providing regulatory guidance where necessary.
• Facilitate introductions between all present
• If required, explain the format of the viva and clarify any special provisions notified in advance by the Graduate School .
• Clarify, for the benefit of the examiners and student, the meaning of the available outcomes (detailed on the Examiner Final Recommendation form)
• Ensure that the supervisor, if present, only acts as an observer and agrees to maintain confidentiality in respect of the content of the examination.
• Ensure that all main items on the agenda are addressed and that the student is given the opportunity to respond to all questions asked by the examiners.
• Ensure that each of the examiners has a proper opportunity to contribute to the examination process.
• Ensure that breaks are offered to the student if and when required.
• Should the student become unwell or distressed during the viva, and the examination is stopped, ensure that due process is followed.
• At the end of the viva, ensure that actions required of the candidate and the examiners are clear and understood by all parties.
• Advise the examiners that reports and details of the required amendments should be returned to gradresearch@uhi.ac.uk within one week of the viva taking place; ensuring this is done is normally the responsibility of the internal examiner, although by mutual consent, the internal panel chair may be tasked this activity.

The internal panel chair should:

• Be available to the student if they have queries about the outcome of the examination, providing clarification where necessary.
• Act as the intermediary between the Director of Studies and examiners where any clarification on required corrections is needed. Note, students should not contact examiners directly.
• Report any concerns following the viva to the Graduate School directly
• Complete the internal panel chair section on the final recommendations report form.

In the event of disagreement between the examiners, the chair will seek to reach an agreed conclusion. The chair does not have a casting vote. In the event of the examiners failing to reach agreement, the chair should ensure that the examiners complete the required individual report.

• A pre-meeting should be held before the viva when the examiners should read each other’s independent preliminary report (if not exchanged and reviewed beforehand). The examiners should also agree the structure of the questioning and the areas which will be investigated.  
• While practice may be as flexible as is required, a viva should not normally be less than one and a half hours.  When an examination lasts longer than two hours, appropriate breaks must be agreed.  
• The internal and external examiners are equal as examiners, but the internal will normally consider it appropriate to defer to the external in the conduct of the examination.  When two externals have been appointed, they too are equal as examiners.
• The entire examination panel is required to be present for the duration of the examination, including when communicating the overall result to the student.
• At the end of the viva, the student and supervisor (if present) should be asked to withdraw while the examiners discuss their report.
• When the decision is agreed, the examiners may make their joint recommendation known to the candidate but must make clear that the final decision rests with the Research Degrees Committee, which may accept or revise the examiners’ recommendation. 

Ideally, a member of the supervisory team should be available before and after the student undergoes a viva, to provide friendly support to the student. The student, the examiners and the internal chair are normally the only persons who may be present at the viva, however a member of the supervisory team may attend on the agreement of the examination panel and student. If a supervisor does attend, they should only observe and must not participate, and at the end of the viva they should leave with the student.

• If, owing to illness or other urgent and unforeseen reason, an examiner is unable to attend the viva, it may be postponed to a later date. If it seems that the likely length of postponement would be a serious hardship to the student, it should be considered whether it is appropriate to appoint an alternative examiner. 
• If a student is unwell immediately prior to the viva such that they are unable to attend it, they should immediately notify their Director of Studies and the Graduate School; relevant medical evidence in connection to the illness will be required. 
• In attending the viva, the student is declaring themself fit to do so. However, if a student but becomes so unwell or distressed during it, as to be unable to proceed, the examiners should - after consultation with the student - decide whether to continue.  If they do continue, the examiners should note in their final report that the student was unwell. 
• If the decision is taken to not continue, the examiners should determine whether they have enough evidence to decide or whether it will be necessary to continue the viva on another occasion. The student can also request that the viva be adjourned based on ill health after discussing the matter with the examiners. 
• If academic misconduct is alleged or suspected in the actual thesis during the examination process, the examination process must be stopped immediately, even if this is on the day of the viva. The investigation procedures will then be undertaken through the university’s academic misconduct policy and procedures. 

Although it is envisaged that the standard viva format would be face-to-face, with all participants attending in person, if the external examiner is based at a distance in the UK or overseas, we ask that you consider the environmental impact of opting for this instead of using the video conference or hybrid options. Please also note that the Graduate School cannot cover the cost of the external examiner's travel expenses from overseas.

When the viva is being held face-to-face, it should be held on campus at one of the academic partner colleges or at UHI Executive Office in Inverness, with all attendees meeting in person. On such occasions, the room in which the viva is being held should be free from external interruptions, including the telephone, and relatively free from obtrusive noise. 

Where the external examiner is based at a distance, or prefers to attend by video conference, it will normally be expected that the entire exam panel and the student attend by video conference - noting that the internal examiner's online attendance does not necessarily require them to be off-site.

Where this is the case and the student has a preference, or need, to use campus facilities only the internal chair should attend in person with the student and the videoconferencing principles and guidance should be followed.

If a viva takes place by video conference, the principles below should be followed:

• The viva should not be conducted by audio only, or by telephone conference
• The viva will not be recorded
• To maintain high academic standards, the assessment must remain fair and robust and impartial, and the expectations for the conduct of the examination – including examiner input and the behaviour of all participants – is the same as when face-to-face
• Should local or national requirements result in campus closure, the student has the right to decline the opportunity for a viva by VC and ask for the viva process to be delayed until a later date when face-to-face examination can resume
• When agreeing to undergo examination by VC, the student accepts that they cannot use the format of the viva as a basis for appeal, unless there is a clear breach of regulations
• A member of the student’s supervisory team may attend the viva under the same terms and conditions of attendance as with standard face-to-face format, which requires approval by the degree candidate and the examiners. Their involvement must be in a non-intrusive and non-participatory (observer) capacity and to achieve this, during the viva they must switch off their own live video stream and mute their microphone from their connection, but they may listen to and view the proceedings. They must agree not to be in contact with the candidate and the candidate must also agree not to be in contact with the DoS in any way, by any means, during the examination.  Failure to comply may nullify the result of the examination and could lead to possible disciplinary procedures
• Where some or all attendees are online, the independent Internal Panel Chair will have additional responsibilities, as outlined in the Viva by VC guidance. 

• All participants must have a test call approximately 48 hours before the examination is due to take place. This is not only to ensure the technology works but that each location is suitable. It is also an opportunity for the independent internal panel chair to clarify how the examination will be conducted, including protocols for a drop in connection or abandoning the examination due to technical problems (see below) 
• The candidate must inform the examination panel of any academic/research-related materials they intend to have with them and may wish to share with the panel. This may only include relevant material for the purpose of illustrating a critical point in the thesis and/or material that is directly relevant to the viva – for example, in respect of Creative areas such as Art, Design, Performance and Music-based disciplines.  It is not intended to permit any inappropriate prompts or helps for the candidate in respect of their viva defence.  It is also to be noted that presentation of such material will be affected by the use of video conference technology, and therefore only material suitable for use in this context will be permitted. 

• Each party must introduce themselves and their role (if preferred, this may form the substance of the initial ‘test call’ but with a brief reminder at the start of the formal viva examination)
• The internal panel chair should confirm the student’s identify (the student should be asked to show their UHI student ID card, or the Director of Studies may link-in at the beginning of the viva to confirm the identify)
• If the candidate has notified the panel of any materials they want to have present then these must now be shown and must remain visible throughout.  They must also confirm that they do not have with them - or have visible to them or available to them in audible form of any kind - any prompts or other inappropriate guidance and advice that would normally be banned within any formal examination process
• The internal panel chair will confirm the process for the examination including the protocol for any drop in connection and any technical issues which results in the examination needing to be abandoned (see below).  

• All parties must remain visible throughout, with the sole exception of a short comfort break, which may be permitted in cases where the viva extends beyond 2 hours, or by the agreement of all parties
• Unless agreed as part of a formal Personal Learning Support Plan, the University will not normally permit any person other than a member of the supervisory team to be present. Ideally there should be someone nearby (either physically or in a suitable on-line space) in the event that the experience is distressing in some way, or they feel unwell
• The examination will follow the normal format for a viva voce examination
• The internal panel chair should ensure that the student is not disadvantaged in any way, when compared to the standard face-to-face examination and will have the right to suspend or terminate the viva if technology is not satisfactory (see below).  The internal panel chair will not normally be involved in direct questioning of the student
• In the event of any failure with the technology before or during the viva, or other concerns regarding the conduct of the viva, it is the responsibility of the internal panel chair to suspend the examination and to decide whether it is possible for the viva to continue or whether it should be re-scheduled. 

• All participants will be asked to confirm that the viva by video conference format has had no substantive bearing on the examination process. 
• The student will be specifically asked to confirm that they acknowledge the completion of the viva event. 

• Examiners will discuss in private the examination and determine the outcome, which will then be shared orally and informally with the degree candidate.  This will involve the degree candidate logging out of the video conference for a period to be determined by the examination panel, but this will not be more than 60 minutes.  Before beginning their discussions, the examiners will ascertain that they are the only remaining participants in the video conference
• Once the examiners have concluded their assessment and all parties have returned to the video conference, the internal panel chair will confirm the decision of the examiners
• The Director of Studies, or another member of the supervisory team, should be available immediately after the viva has formally been concluded to provide support, if required, to the student
• Examiners should complete the joint examiner’s report form, commenting on the conduct of the viva voce examination.  They should refer explicitly to the use of video conferencing, recording any breaks in connectivity and their duration, or other issues affecting the viva and what impact they had on the conduct of the viva and student
• The internal panel chair should complete their section of the joint report form referring explicitly to the use of video conferencing, recording any breaks in connectivity and their duration, or other issues affecting the viva and what impact they had on the conduct of the viva and candidate. 

For the award of Master of Philosophy the student should have successfully completed a programme of scholarly research and produced a thesis that makes a contribution to knowledge, affords evidence or originality and demonstrates application of independent research. The thesis must be defended through a viva voce examination. Please note MPhil is an exit award option from a PhD and is not available as a target award.

For the award of Doctor of Philosophy the student should have successfully completed a programme of scholarly research and produced a thesis that makes a distinct and original contribution to knowledge in the discipline and contains work which is considered to be worthy of publication. The thesis must be defended through a viva voce examination.

Should be carried out within six months. Normally, both the internal and external examiners are required to check that the necessary corrections have been completed and submit formal confirmation of this to the Graduate School.

Should not exceed twelve months. If an examiner is required to re-read the whole or a significant part of the thesis, or to check every quotation and reference again, then the recommendation should probably be that the student be given the opportunity to resubmit the thesis in a revised form. 

When re-submission is recommended, the examiners should also make recommendations about the conditions for re-submission and must provide a written statement about what is required to bring the thesis up to an appropriate standard for the award of the degree. 

This statement will be given to the student, who should consult with their Director of Studies if there are any queries when revising the thesis. The student should not be in contact with the examiners during this time and the internal chair, or Director of Studies, may contact the examiners for points of clarification only. 

For thesis including publications, examiners are not permitted to request a re-write of published material into standard format following the viva, however they may request inclusion of additional information as an addendum or within the introduction or conclusion of the chapter containing the publication.

While recognising the need for researchers to protect their own research interests, UHI encourages all researchers to be as open as possible in discussing their work with others and with the public.  Once results have been published, UHI expects researchers to make available relevant data and materials to other researchers, on request, provided that this is consistent with any ethical approvals and consents which cover the data and materials and any intellectual property rights. 

UHI recognises that publication of the results of research may need to be delayed for a reasonable period pending protection of intellectual property arising from the research.  However, any such period of delay in publication should be kept to a minimum

Where available, UHI expects researchers to observe the standards of research practice set out in codes and guidelines published by scientific and learned societies, and other professional bodies.  All researchers should take the necessary steps to ensure they familiarise themselves with the legal requirements that regulate their work, and of all appropriate ethical considerations.

Senior colleagues will ensure that a research climate of mutual co-operation is created in which all members of a research team or an individual are encouraged to develop their skills, and in which the open exchange of ideas and appropriate acknowledgement of the direct and indirect contributions of others is fostered. 

Supervisors are required to supervise all stages of the research process, including outlining or drawing up a hypothesis, preparing applications for funding, protocol design, data recording and data analysis.  It is the responsibility of the research supervisor to explain best research practice and ethical considerations as early as possible. 

Research students will receive training in the Policy and Guidelines on Good Research Practice at induction and throughout their programme of study.  It will be a condition of their transition beyond their first year that they have been trained in good practice and satisfactorily understood the Policy and Guidelines.

At the outset of a research programme all researchers should be clear on management and ownership of data and samples used or created in the course of the research, and the results of the research. 

All researchers must keep clear and accurate records of the procedures followed and approvals granted during the research process, including records of the interim results obtained as well as of the final research outcomes.  This is necessary not only as a means of demonstrating proper research practices, but also in case questions are subsequently asked about either the conduct of the research or the results obtained.  The maintenance of accurate records is also important for potential subsequent commercialisation of research. 

Data generated in the course of research must be kept securely in paper or electronic format, as appropriate and in accordance with good practice in the storage of primary data, record-keeping and ethical issues.  Back-up records should always be kept for data stored on a computer. Supervisors have a right to access research data stored on UHI systems that are to be used when undertaking research degree studies. This is a standard requirement as part of the Quality Assurance processes of the university and helps to provide assurance externally, not only of the quality but also the integrity of a UHI research degree.

In progressing investigations, researchers should actively consider any risk that their research will generate/outcomes that could be misused for harmful purposes.  Where such risks exist, they should seek advice, initially from their Director of Studies, as to the steps taken to minimise such risks.

Results of research should be published in an appropriate form consistent with the academic discipline.  It is the responsibility of the lead author to ensure familiarity with the appropriate form.  No paper, abstract, report or other output should be submitted without the permission of every individual named on the output, and no person should be named as a contributor without their consent.  Anyone who consents to being listed as an author on a paper should accept responsibility for ensuring that they are familiar with the contents of the paper and can identify their contribution to it. 

The practice of honorary authorship is unacceptable and the contribution of formal collaborators and all others who directly assist or indirectly support the research must be properly acknowledged.

Researchers must keep clear and accurate records of the procedures followed, and approvals granted during a research process, including records of the interim results obtained as well as of the final research outcomes.  This is necessary not only as a means of demonstrating proper research practices, but also in case questions are asked subsequently about either the conduct or output of the research.  The maintenance of accurate records is also important for potential subsequent commercialisation of research. 

1. Keeping formal or written electronic records - Researchers should keep a formal record of their work in a notebook, or where appropriate, an electronic record, used specifically for this purpose. Where practicable, one central master record should be maintained for each research project. 
2. Data generated - Data generated in the course of research should be kept securely in paper or electronic format as appropriate, and in accordance with good practice in the storage of primary data, record-keeping, ethical issues, the Data Protection Act and the University Research Data Management Policy.

Back-up records should always be kept for data stored on a computer, or preferably, electronic records should be stored on shared drives, which are backed up daily.  Consideration should also be given to whether back-up copies of research samples in other formats e.g., biological specimens should be kept.

The university has adopted a policy and procedures on Promoting a Positive Learning Environment, supported by the Student Code of Conduct, which sets out expectations with regard to student behaviour. Alleged breaches of the Student Code of Conduct will be investigated under these procedures.